-
2019-04-30 20:18:42+00:00
What a difference a year makes!
Top pic is 2017, the year we closed our Series A and released Factom Harmony.
Botto… https://t.co/eg6ELua8WB
-
2019-04-29 05:41:26+00:00
Okay thank you, 👍 been looking for a while now.
-
2019-04-27 14:01:10+00:00
The party’s on discord!
-
2019-04-27 12:34:09+00:00
See invite to the Discord few messages above
-
2019-04-27 08:17:11+00:00
So feel free to ask us any of your questions. We can certainly help you
-
2019-04-27 08:16:48+00:00
There is no official telegram group but this is the most official one with the presence of the Factom Authority Node Operators in this channel
-
2019-04-27 06:57:05+00:00
Official group of Factom?
-
2019-04-25 20:38:46+00:00
Here's a throwback to 2017 - This was one of our favorite team building activities! Stay tuned for more leading up… https://t.co/8GpZONQ95C
-
2019-04-21 14:19:43+00:00
what happened?
-
2019-04-21 09:54:14+00:00
There’s some talk about that over on the discord as well. Is this @Journol from discord?
-
2019-04-20 20:48:32+00:00
https://discord.gg/RNw3PQs
-
2019-04-20 20:48:29+00:00
No need to guess. Hop into the discord and someone can help. It may have more to do w BTC than Factom.
-
2019-04-19 07:21:31+00:00
You should ask in the discord https://discord.gg/ZNXqYh
-
2019-04-19 05:25:14+00:00
Anyone want to do a review of Factom for a crypto site?
https://blockwise.app/coin/fct
-
2019-04-18 18:04:17+00:00
Attention Houston blockchain enthusiasts - Join our COO Laurie Pyle at the @blockchainhtx Q2 event next Monday Apri… https://t.co/dfbSz9DhqR
-
2019-04-18 11:03:53+00:00
this one is set to never expire
-
2019-04-18 11:03:38+00:00
Hey 🙂 Try this link https://discord.gg/MhUzPKW by default discord links expire after 1 day
-
2019-04-18 10:31:32+00:00
Link to discord above
-
2019-04-18 05:19:22+00:00
🤔🤔🤔
-
2019-04-18 05:19:18+00:00
Hello, everyone. I want to know who to look for for business cooperation.
-
2019-04-16 22:54:49+00:00
https://discord.gg/ZNXqYh
-
2019-04-16 22:53:36+00:00
Best best is the discord channel. Awesome community there.
-
2019-04-16 22:53:25+00:00
-
2019-04-12 12:40:42+00:00
Yes it is up for an hour now
-
2019-04-12 12:28:57+00:00
already up
-
2019-04-12 09:29:44+00:00
still down,sad
-
2019-04-12 09:11:05+00:00
thx
-
2019-04-12 09:11:03+00:00
ok
-
2019-04-12 09:10:35+00:00
We have restarted. We should know whether it worked in 10-20 minutes
-
2019-04-12 09:09:32+00:00
Yes it is stalled. All the authority node operators are on it. I'll let you know asap
-
2019-04-12 09:09:04+00:00
i can't transfer the fct for this afternoon, always timeout to get acknowledgement
-
2019-04-12 09:07:10+00:00
hey i looks like that the factom network is down
-
2019-04-11 22:45:09+00:00
#FactomProtocol is pleased to announce its sponsorship and participation at the world's largest Hackathon event taking place in the Netherlands from April 11-15 http://bit.ly/2VD7LOb
Several ambassadors & an exciting new product by @TFALabs for securing data of IoT devices on the #FactomProtocol.
http://bit.ly/2VHkOxW
-
2019-04-11 17:05:07+00:00
Who is he? :)
-
2019-04-11 17:04:40+00:00
Yeah he was just telling me how much he digs that platform.
-
2019-04-11 17:03:29+00:00
Also super excited to hear about the collaboration with Streamr
-
2019-04-11 17:02:55+00:00
Yeah agree, what benefit would it bring
-
2019-04-11 16:59:11+00:00
Sitting here with one of the creators right now. It can indeed run on a private network. That just won’t offer the benefits of the public immutable chain, likely including regulatory compliance benefits.
-
2019-04-11 16:57:03+00:00
Oh good question. Can’t speak to that.
-
2019-04-11 16:56:21+00:00
Thanks. But still confused. TFA answered a question on Reddit:
The SMD is designed to sit on a PCB or adaptor which is capable of communication. So that might be a USB stick to a PC, a Raspberry Pi/Arduino, or specialist IoT boards (we are working on a full stack .NET solution). Whether the hashes are public or not, will depend on the customer’s needs.
So it could be that the majority of hashes are created onto a private network?
-
2019-04-11 16:50:18+00:00
If the hash was created by making an entry to the public chain then yes. If it’s on a private network then no but then they aren’t acting as a customer and don’t get the benefit of the public “immutable” chain.
-
2019-04-11 16:39:08+00:00
not sure if I got that right but if a customer decides not to make a hash public, will it still burn FCTs?
-
2019-04-11 15:12:18+00:00
the video for this is great
-
2019-04-11 08:46:02+00:00
It’s an incredible accomplishment. We’ve got a lot of work to do to make the most of these things though, marketingwise.
-
2019-04-11 06:34:04+00:00
https://medium.com/@LabsTfa/tfa-labs-announce-a-solution-for-securing-data-in-billions-of-iot-devices-using-the-factom-64f4a11c68f8?sk=aee9dcd088f2258bb5689d7f72893dd5
-
2019-04-10 18:33:22+00:00
Nice! Thanks for sharing
-
2019-04-09 14:22:49+00:00
why u talking about it here in factom group?
-
2019-04-08 20:10:11+00:00
Thanks guys!
-
2019-04-08 20:06:00+00:00
@Matthias_F some spam to remove from channel
-
2019-04-05 00:09:10+00:00
https://discord.gg/RNw3PQs
-
2019-04-05 00:08:37+00:00
Discord channel is your best bet
-
2019-04-04 23:45:50+00:00
how can i sent fct via Factom API?
-
2019-04-04 23:45:50+00:00
hey , are there any develop of fct in this group?
-
2019-04-04 20:43:50+00:00
Did you see bitcoin price?🙈
-
2019-04-03 05:44:53+00:00
hey~ how can i make a transfer by fct apis?
-
2019-04-02 19:46:28+00:00
Bigtime 🤙🏼
-
2019-04-02 19:46:04+00:00
;)
-
2019-04-02 19:46:02+00:00
But obviously we have one point in common: We both believe in an increase of FCT price in the future
-
2019-04-02 19:45:20+00:00
I think we are repeating ourselves
-
2019-04-02 19:45:09+00:00
Let's stop here.
-
2019-04-02 19:44:30+00:00
It matters when you can’t reliably pick winners and losers. I’d say it matters quite a bit, actually.
-
2019-04-02 19:42:28+00:00
and with some commen sense, you clearly see that this will happen
-
2019-04-02 19:42:01+00:00
True. But that doesn't matter if most of the projects will fail
-
2019-04-02 19:41:39+00:00
Except that similar goods will always be compared and valued relative to each other until it’s clear if and how they should be treated differently.
-
2019-04-02 19:40:10+00:00
Well, nobody has really a clue how the crypto market works. It's a completely new asset type. We don't have any previous experience and you cannot make any conclusions based on previous asset classes
-
2019-04-02 19:39:56+00:00
Point 2 tl;dr is our “floor price” will never be our actual price so comparing to floor price is the faulty starting point. Especially when no other project Im aware of even has one to calculate.
-
2019-04-02 19:38:19+00:00
Point 2)
Token price will never sit at the floor. Speculative value will always be a factor. Just like Amazon, Tesla etc trading at exponential premiums while running years of $100m+ losses.
Future expected value is always part of current price. As we see now in a time of almost no use bc we’re just coming out of the initial necessary infrastructure dev and into our first real product and adoption phase.
-
2019-04-02 19:35:55+00:00
That’s my $.02 on point 1.
-
2019-04-02 19:35:24+00:00
That’s not how markets work, though, is it? Prices of volatile, tradable assets are by definition made relative to comparable assets. In this case it’s a field of crypto projects competing for limited investor appetite for crypto assets. People are choosing between FCT and several thousand other projects and the dynamic tension between perceived value is where price is discovered.
So it doesn’t matter that most projects will disappear. The fact that they exist now is relevant. Supporters of other projects also assume most projects that aren’t theirs will fail. The fact that many of them are priced higher than FCT is relevant.
-
2019-04-02 19:24:53+00:00
Switched to desktop version (don't like typing on the phone): Alright, the point I am trying to make:
1) Most of the projects out there are garbage. They will sooner or later fail. Hence, let's focus on factom. There is no point comparing Factom to the others since they will eventually disappear.
2) Factom provides a good solution that requires blockchain technology. BUT the price at the moment is way above the current use and there are also some challenges which are not resolved such as scaling. So speculation is already to some kind of degree priced in to the current Factom price.
My question: What are the additional fundamentals in your opinion?
3) But yes, you can always make the arg
-
2019-04-02 19:18:30+00:00
Not really. If factom has better price-to-current-use ratio than tokens ranked above it and that’s the metric that matters then by definition FCTs fundamentals aren’t currently priced in “relative to the field”. So by your criteria FCT should be higher. I submit there there are additional fundamentals that are also not priced in, likely to do lack of awareness/buzz, so FCT merits being higher still. That’s all I was saying
-
2019-04-02 19:14:22+00:00
does this answer your question?
-
2019-04-02 19:14:13+00:00
its good. but I believe most projects will fail (90% plus). So this positions factom. a bit better but still no guarantee
-
2019-04-02 19:13:09+00:00
ok
-
2019-04-02 19:12:45+00:00
This is not the point you made. Back it up, please. Assumptions in your original point:
-Current use is the relevant metric for fundamentals
-Factom price is appropriate (or maybe even high) relative to this metric
My question then:
How does the rest of the field (let’s narrow it to tokens *above* FCT in the top 100) compare in a price-to-current-use ratio.
-
2019-04-02 19:11:10+00:00
and at the moment, FCT price many fold above its floor
-
2019-04-02 19:10:12+00:00
only thing I care is about factom and protocol usage
-
2019-04-02 19:09:56+00:00
yeah, but if they all fail I dont care
-
2019-04-02 19:09:26+00:00
👆🏼
-
2019-04-02 19:09:22+00:00
just focuse on the interesting stuff, namely factom
-
2019-04-02 19:09:17+00:00
That’s not what I asked
-
2019-04-02 19:09:07+00:00
lets foeget about the rest of the field
-
2019-04-02 19:08:57+00:00
ok
-
2019-04-02 19:08:48+00:00
It’s more specific and operates within your point.
-
2019-04-02 19:08:24+00:00
I’d rather get your sense of the question I just asked
-
2019-04-02 19:07:59+00:00
Ok, lets go back one step. How do you define fundamentals?
-
2019-04-02 19:07:35+00:00
How does the rest of the field rank for current use relative to their price?
-
2019-04-02 19:07:24+00:00
I think most projects will disappear within the next X years...
-
2019-04-02 19:07:05+00:00
I’m not talking about eventually
-
2019-04-02 19:06:45+00:00
But eventually it will be the most important one...
-
2019-04-02 19:06:37+00:00
Especially when I said “relative to the rest of the field”.
-
2019-04-02 19:06:14+00:00
And a misleading and inaccurate one.
-
2019-04-02 19:06:03+00:00
Agree
-
2019-04-02 19:05:30+00:00
Current use is only one aspect of fundamentals.
-
2019-04-02 19:05:27+00:00
but still, I think Factom has one of the best use case
-
2019-04-02 19:04:50+00:00
if you look at the current use of the protocol and the fct price
-
2019-04-02 19:04:30+00:00
they are
-
2019-04-02 18:19:23+00:00
Relative to the field I don’t think our fundamentals are priced in yet.
-
2019-04-02 18:12:15+00:00
nothing to do with fundamentals
-
2019-04-02 18:11:44+00:00
just a regular everything pumps
-
2019-04-02 18:11:31+00:00
dont get to excited
-
2019-04-01 23:23:47+00:00
Hi