-
2019-03-31 16:57:19+00:00
Money?
-
2019-03-31 09:17:18+00:00
Who do u think are the apostles of MAGa?
-
2019-03-31 07:07:06+00:00
Part of a new dogma could involve: transhumanism & singularity theory - hello brave new world :)
-
2019-03-31 06:47:22+00:00
"Atheism is on the rise in US from 6% in 90th to 23%. I'm pretty skeptical that all of these people truly have no religion. USSR also was considered an atheist state yet it was the most dogmatic place in the world: religion was communism, communist party was god, Marx and Engels where apostles, Lenin was Jesus, party secretaries were the holy Popes. We might see birth of new major religion or maybe it has been born , but I didn't notice it. 👼"
Just to clarify some terms:
atheist ≠no religion
atheist ≠not dogmatic
not religious ≠dogmatic
not religious ≠not dogmatic
religious ≠dogmatic
religious ≠not dogmatic
Maybe we (the great US citizen or glorious US residents) might see the rise of a new dogma.
My suggestion for a recently risen dogma in the US: "Make America (the US) great again".
Which, in terms of ideology / dogma, might be described as revisionist nationalism.
-
2019-03-17 17:51:35+00:00
Sorry is in spanish but there is an option in Twitter so the twit can be translate.
Here there is the break on the mith that before Chávez And Maduro's Chavismo there was an right wing goberment for many years that didnt do annything but "oppres" the people when reality was so much different https://mobile.twitter.com/phenobarbital/status/1107250860520861697
-
2019-03-17 13:31:02+00:00
Hmm I am saying that the benefit of the UK is very very unclear. It's hard to say something is for or against the benefit of it.
-
2019-03-17 13:29:22+00:00
yes, surely a good strategy
-
2019-03-17 13:22:03+00:00
Only, what are the benefits of a country...?... Just wondering... I do get what you mean though.
-
2019-03-17 13:20:38+00:00
I think there's no point being offended about what is written in any newspaper. You don't like dont read that newspaper, if you really hate it write your own article and push it too newspapers.
-
2019-03-17 13:17:54+00:00
Well I don't know much about BBC Farsi and equally not much about BBC on Iranian issues.
-
2019-03-17 13:15:13+00:00
So your newspapers are very reliable. ok.
-
2019-03-17 13:14:30+00:00
But I do have to point out that Trump and BBC have little similarites.
-
2019-03-17 13:13:34+00:00
Sorry, yeah, I didn't mean that, I was using the 'you' as a reference to people in general.
-
2019-03-17 13:09:10+00:00
Same way I suppose Iranian Newspapers do not cover well events happening in western world
-
2019-03-17 13:08:00+00:00
I think , It's hard for western journalists to have a good level of understanding of what is happening in Iran.
-
2019-03-17 13:07:12+00:00
I see. I wouldn't call it a double standard of the news, but yeah, they focus much more on some attacks than on others.
Or do you mean the way they talk about those attacks? Like using Christchurch instead of NZMosque?
I think it is too strong to say double standard, but I understand if people have that feeling.
For Trump, he surely has a double standard. (If he has standards at all?)
I personally try to not read what Trump says, about half of it is lies and most of it hateful.
The problem is this: If you listen to people like Trump, you begin to adapt his double standard and start to think in a double standard yourself. And you begin to hate (just what Trump wants?).
-
2019-03-17 12:29:44+00:00
Another example of claiming wrong things on text you didn't read, because you are already so sure of your position that you don't even bother to look anymore.
But hey, you're not the first to do that.
And it does demonstrate a strong feeling of double standard in you at least.
-
2019-03-02 22:40:50+00:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMqi3mphXck