-
2019-07-29 06:39:33+00:00
I totaly agree with u.
-
2019-07-28 21:38:46+00:00
I think Trump's motivation here is not based on the social and economic rationalities, but on his conviction to use fears and racist sentiments for political capital.
I think building walls could be perceived as simply silly, but they have great symbolic meaning, which will potentially influence LATAM-US relations for decades.
-
2019-07-28 12:58:07+00:00
yeah, I forgot all his reasoning... I recalled one of his speeches where he did mention jobs, crime and other things ... the usual rant... his official reasoning doesnt matter, he's playing with insecurities of the mob (which most of politicians do) and it working. I think it silly, but there's nothing terrible about building walls... I guess China's Great Wall will have a competitor in the future ))
-
2019-07-28 10:14:50+00:00
what is it?
-
2019-07-23 06:12:51+00:00
Thanks
-
2019-07-23 00:18:42+00:00
what is his name ?
-
2019-07-22 19:21:32+00:00
Who is this guy ?
Economic terrorism, sounds like a sophism.
-
2019-07-19 20:48:16+00:00
Good evining anyone there
-
2019-07-18 18:09:12+00:00
I'm not engaged in any argument to use strawman or any other trick. But I understood ur point. Thanks
-
2019-07-18 17:48:31+00:00
I did not specify ideas, so any ideas. It feels a bit repetitive.
-
2019-07-18 17:47:21+00:00
What ideas ?
-
2019-07-18 17:46:54+00:00
Ideas are cool, but it has to work in reality as well.
-
2019-07-18 17:45:56+00:00
That's a strawman :) Also in my country there are mechanisms where numbers of people can introduce issues to parliament.
-
2019-07-18 17:44:22+00:00
Let's say your country decides to go to war, u don't want to have your say ?
-
2019-07-18 17:42:58+00:00
As I said it just doesn't scale. Personally it's the same, I have other stuff to do than read hundreds of papers weekly.
-
2019-07-18 17:42:45+00:00
I mean constitutional judges
-
2019-07-18 17:42:10+00:00
And judge is chosen for life, am I right?
-
2019-07-18 17:41:12+00:00
If u're against having voting right for every law personally, I'd love to know why you personally wouldn't want it?
-
2019-07-18 17:36:56+00:00
Good luck with that;)
-
2019-07-18 17:35:48+00:00
Are u worried that majority would want to take away money from rich and give out to others ?
-
2019-07-18 17:34:27+00:00
I'm not other people so I can't speak for them, but I can reply in my own way.
-
2019-07-18 17:33:05+00:00
But not about other people, u can answer weather u would accept it ?
-
2019-07-18 17:32:33+00:00
U can also answer
-
2019-07-18 17:32:19+00:00
I was giving my view on the question and the implication on the system.
-
2019-07-18 17:31:42+00:00
Not weather it will work
-
2019-07-18 17:31:29+00:00
I asked if he would accept it
-
2019-07-18 17:31:09+00:00
What
-
2019-07-18 17:30:54+00:00
But I never asked about system
-
2019-07-18 17:30:32+00:00
I'm talking about the system.
-
2019-07-18 17:29:53+00:00
Why are u talking about other people?
-
2019-07-18 17:29:30+00:00
Easily manipulated.
-
2019-07-18 17:27:30+00:00
Obvious result is standstill. So probably not the best idea, seeing how many issues are ahead...
-
2019-07-18 17:26:31+00:00
Good evining
-
2019-07-18 17:26:18+00:00
U don't accept it ?
-
2019-07-18 17:26:00+00:00
No one would do that, there are hundreds of laws passed weekly. No one would read them.
-
2019-07-18 17:25:10+00:00
If u had a chance to vote for every law online instead of choosing party for 4 years, would u accept it ?
-
2019-07-18 17:22:20+00:00
Are u happy with them ?
-
2019-07-18 17:22:05+00:00
How are they ?
-
2019-07-14 14:51:12+00:00
To me it is most representative data. It's a data of people who read what I say. In a way @talks subscribers are extension of me.
-
2019-07-14 14:35:57+00:00
Representative to whom?
-
2019-07-14 14:35:32+00:00
I don't think you'll get representative data.
-
2019-07-14 14:33:26+00:00
No connection , I'm just testing human biases. I'm working on a semantic test on 3 religious books on IBM Watson and wanted to compare those results with my findings.
-
2019-07-14 14:30:47+00:00
I think the age of fortune is better to be the president of country . In this age the accumulate of knowledge and experience is suitable.
-
2019-07-14 12:42:08+00:00
Where is the connection of the dumb polls on religions to inspiring talks?
-
2019-07-14 12:40:19+00:00
Simple age of candidacy is 35 in US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_candidacy#United_States
-
2019-07-01 07:44:39+00:00
Have you heard about "Great Pacific Garbage Patch" ?